{"id":54770,"date":"2008-10-02T12:53:53","date_gmt":"2008-10-02T02:53:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2008\/10\/02\/here-come-the-iron-ore-price-downgrades\/"},"modified":"2008-10-02T12:53:53","modified_gmt":"2008-10-02T02:53:53","slug":"here-come-the-iron-ore-price-downgrades","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2008\/10\/02\/here-come-the-iron-ore-price-downgrades\/","title":{"rendered":"Here Come The Iron Ore Price Downgrades"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--StartFragment --> <\/p>\n<p>By Greg Peel<\/p>\n<p>The offer on the table from BHP Billiton ((BHP)) for rival Rio Tinto ((RIO)) stands at 3.4 BHP shares for one Rio, but in Tuesday&#8217;s rout that ratio had fallen to 2.7 to one. As the merger story has dragged on and on, market enthusiasm for a positive result has waned. Early jubilation was somewhat naive, however, as the process was always going to be a lengthy one.<\/p>\n<p>But yesterday the Australian Competition &amp; Consumer Commission granted approval, thus alleviating fears that the ACCC would find a merged entity just too monopolistically powerful in global commodities markets, particularly in iron ore. Rio investors can thank Andrew Forrest, as the emergence of Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) as a viable competitor helped sway the ACCC&#8217;s view.<\/p>\n<p>It is now expected the equivalent European regulator will have trouble ruling in opposition to its Australian counterpart.<\/p>\n<p>In response, Rio shares jumped sharply yesterday. BHP shares also jumped, but on a day featuring a strong upside reversal in the index it&#8217;s hard to extract just what proportion was down to the ruling. Rio clearly outperformed nevertheless, taking the implied ratio back up to 2.9 to one. BHP&#8217;s closing price yesterday of $32.75 implies a takeover price for Rio of $111.35, compared to Rio&#8217;s $95.00 close.<\/p>\n<p>The news is also good for BHP, all things being equal, as a merged entity will gain that much more leverage in future iron ore contract price negotiations with major customers, particularly China. It&#8217;s a costly exercise, but at present BHP represents the equivalent one of the most stable economies in the world and has little in the way of funding problems.<\/p>\n<p>The boost in excitement has come, however, amidst a global commodity price downturn. BHP and Rio have only just begun to reap the spoils of this year&#8217;s hefty price increase on annual iron ore contracts, but by the end of the year the protracted negotiations should begin for the following year&#8217;s price. The 85% jump enjoyed this year, finally set in June, was settled amidst the ongoing commodity price surge, and at the time analysts were already predicting another 20% increase for 2009. Now, however, the global economic scene is much more dour.<\/p>\n<p>Macquarie analysts were among the first to reduce their expectations, deciding recently that iron ore prices would only &#8220;roll over&#8221; in 2009, meaning a 0% change. Today Merrill Lynch has joined the reassessment.<\/p>\n<p>Merrill Lynch takes us back to 2005, the last time the iron ore price made a substantial jump (71%). In 2005 the global economy remained strong, unlike today.<\/p>\n<p>After the increased price settlement, the spot iron ore price then fell 31% from March to June. The hot-rolled coil steel price fell 40% by October. This year the spot iron ore price has already fallen 44% from its peak above the contract price, but to date China&#8217;s HRC steel price has only fallen 22%.<\/p>\n<p>Merrills expects Chinese steel production to reduce, thus stabilising prices into 2009 after a further fall, probably in time for the next iron ore contract price negotiation. However, while the analysts had previously assumed a 15% increase in the 2009 price over 2008, they have now pulled their expectation back to a 10% increase. Their further 10% increase expected in 2010 is now 0%, and their 0% expectation for FY11 is now a fall of 10%.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, the analysts have downgraded their 2008 forecast earnings for Rio by 3%, 2009 by 2% and 2010 by 6%. They cannot, however, provide a target price and rating as they, like most leading brokers, are involved in merger negotiations and thus restricted from providing investor advice.<\/p>\n<p>They can provide advice on other miners nevertheless, and as such Mount Gibson Iron ((MGX)) has copped a target downgrade from $5.00 to $3.50. But as MGX last closed at $1.80, the large premium still commands a Buy rating. The analysts note MGX represents the lowest risk iron ore &#8220;pure-play&#8221; among the miners they cover.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217; not such a bright story for Murchison Metals ((MMX)) however. Merrills has downgraded MMX&#8217;s forecast FY09 earnings by 57% and FY10 by 31% noting the miner&#8217;s critical production commencement years will occur just as the iron ore price is falling (if the analysts&#8217; assumptions are correct). Their target falls from $6.00 all the way to $2.00 and this results in a double-whammy downgrade from Buy to Underperform.<\/p>\n<p>The only saving grace for MMX in the short term would be a takeover, and China&#8217;s Sino Steel has been granted approval to do so. But Merrills notes Sino has now secured its position in Midwest ((MIS)) and thus will likely wait for progress on MMX&#8217;s resource estimates and the bankable feasibility study before leaping in.<\/p>\n<p>UBS is another broker restricted from passing judgment on Rio, but the analysts have taken the time, nevertheless, to point out Rio is trading at a significant discount to their net present value calculation of $171.97.<\/p>\n<p>For any mining analyst, net present value is a calculation fraught with danger given the volatility of commodity prices and the impact of discounted long term commodity price assumptions. For a large diversified miner, it really becomes a minefield, UBS notes, given all the &#8220;moving parts&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>What the analysts do note, however, is that if you take Tuesday&#8217;s closing price for Rio of $84.50 and work backwards, the market is pricing in an expected 22.5% fall in net long term commodity prices. That means copper, gold, iron ore and coal would all have to fall 50-60% from current spot prices.<\/p>\n<p>Once again, the analysts can say little more beyond pointing out the facts. But reading between the lines, 50-60% falls from here are rather substantial, and although commodity prices always overshoot on the downside, the Rio price pre-ACCC announcement seems to be assuming a prolonged global recession. Perhaps it is the Rio price which has overshot on the downside.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As Rio investors celebrated a positive ruling from the ACCC, the downturn in expected commodity demand has now moved into the bulk material space.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[89,88],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54770"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54770"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54770\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}