##{"id":58698,"date":"2011-08-19T08:38:04","date_gmt":"2011-08-18T22:38:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2011\/08\/19\/the-overnight-report-fear-returns\/"},"modified":"2011-08-19T08:38:04","modified_gmt":"2011-08-18T22:38:04","slug":"the-overnight-report-fear-returns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2011\/08\/19\/the-overnight-report-fear-returns\/","title":{"rendered":"The Overnight Report: Fear Returns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\tBy Greg Peel<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe Dow closed down 419 points or 3.7% to 10,990 while the S&amp;P fell 4.5% to 1140 and the <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">Nasdaq<\/span> dropped 5.2%.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIf you wanted to put a finger on what really caused last night&#039;s sudden renewal of fear across global markets, I&#039;d suggest you could sum it up in one word &ndash; Lehman.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWhat was most notable about Wednesday night&#039;s trade in the northern hemisphere was that the response to the disappointing <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">Merkozy<\/span> announcements was pretty benign. The concept of a <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">eurobond<\/span> was quickly dismissed, the <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">EFSF<\/span> was deemed to be already sufficient, and the idea of a financial transaction tax was touted. Yet on a net basis the European markets didn&#039;t respond much, and Wall Street closed flat.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tSo why is it that media reports will suggest today that last night&#039;s big fall, which begun in Europe, was due to fears over a transaction tax and a lack of further injection of <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">EFSF<\/span> funds? Unless you think of the response as being akin to a small child who thinks very hard before finally bursting into tears, what any sell-off really needed was a more frightening trigger. And that came last night when an unnamed European bank &ldquo;went to the window&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe expression means that a bank was forced to go to the <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">ECB<\/span> to ask for an emergency short-term loan &ndash; in this case <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">E500m<\/span> &#8212; and that signals a liquidity issue. The implication is that the bank was finding it difficult to raise overnight funds in global money markets. The <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">rumour<\/span>, totally unsubstantiated, is that a US bank had gone cold on accepting a European bank as a <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">counterparty<\/span>, given the current risks. And that&#039;s how it all started in 2008 &ndash; first with Bear Stearns and then with Lehman Bros. No wonder there was panic.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tEuropean bank shares were again down double digit percentages, leading the UK, German and French stock indices all down 5-6%. The rout spilled into Wall Street from the open, and US banks ended the day down 5-10%.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIf you want to take the Lehman analogy further, we can reflect on the fact the debt crisis of 2008 merely saw the problem pass from private to public hands, rather than actually being resolved. Back then, the issue was US investment banks owning &ldquo;toxic&rdquo; sub-prime debt which they belligerently continued to carry on their books at around <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">95c<\/span> in the dollar when the market was bidding zero. Right now, the <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">eurozone<\/span> is refusing to mark down &ldquo;toxic&rdquo; peripheral sovereign debt to realistic levels as well. It all ended in tears in 2008. What might happen this time?<\/p>\n<p>\n\tPerhaps the answer lies not in movements on global stock markets last night, but in movements on global bond markets. The bonds of the UK, Germany and France were all bought. The bonds of Spain and Italy were sold, but not by much at all. The yield on both ten years did not exceed 5% despite having been to 6% previously this month. The &ldquo;safe haven&rdquo; US bond was bought, but not by much. The ten-year yield fell only <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">10bps<\/span> to 2.07% despite having hit an all-time record low 1.99% earlier in the session. The rise in US bond prices did not match the fall in US stocks.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tMoreover, recently the <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">ECB<\/span> opened up its balance sheet to European banks for effectively unlimited six month loans. And the European banks haven&#039;t mucked around, having snapped up nearly <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">E50bn<\/span> to date. In other words, the European banks have been propping themselves up. By contrast, Lehman was allowed to go under.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThere was nevertheless more to the story of weakness on wall Street last night.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe US July CPI rose a more than expected 0.5% on higher fuel prices, leaving the annual rate level with June at 3.6%. The core CPI rose 0.2%, increasing the annual rate to 1.8% from 1.6% in June. In theory, there will be no <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">QE3<\/span> if US inflation is not falling.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tUS existing home sales fell an unexpected 3.5% in July to the lowest level since November. The Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index fell to minus 30.7 this month from plus 3.2 last month. Economists had expected a low but still positive number.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe compounding fear on Wall Street last night was, therefore, the old chestnut of double dip. And to top things off last week&#039;s new jobless claims in the US rose by 9,000 to be back above the critical 400,000 number once more.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tStrangely, the Conference Board index of leading economic indicators for July went the other way, rising 0.5% after a 0.3% reading in June, and compared to a 0.2% forecast. However the rise reflected an increase in the money supply, which would be a result of the recent &ldquo;flight to safety&rdquo;, so take that out and economists suggest indicators are showing flat to very low US growth ahead.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tJust to add fuel to the fire, a couple of Wall Street firms decided it was time to lower their global GDP forecasts, picking a bad day to do so.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tMorgan Stanley lowered its 2011 global GDP growth forecast to 3.9% from 4.2% and 2012 to 3.8% from 4.5%. For Europe MS sees only 0.5% growth in 2012, down from 1.2%, and in China 8.7%, down from 9.0%. Goldman Sachs also trimmed its forecasts, lowering global to 4.0% from 4.1% in 2011 and to 4.4% from 4.6% in 2012. Goldman&#039;s US forecast for 2011 is down to 1.7% from 1.8% and for 2012 down to 2.1% from 3.0%. Goldman nevertheless sees 1.4% growth in Europe in 2012.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIt is worth noting that it wasn&#039;t until last week that Goldman Sachs decided to lower its end-2011 target for Australia&#039;s <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">ASX<\/span> 200 to 4450 from 5125, adding a bear case &ldquo;recession scenario&rdquo; target of 3600. <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">FNArena<\/span> has been suggesting since early this year that broker targets of up to 5500 for year-end were simply too high in comparison to falling corporate earnings forecasts, and it&#039;s taken this long for the equity strategists to join the party. Now <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">Goldmans<\/span> is giving us a year-end target range of 3600-4450.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tCheers.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe point here is that brokers are always behind these macro forecast curves and never in front of them, often revising only each quarter or more. Looking at the new forecasts above there are indeed some big cuts &ndash; Morgan taking Europe 2012 to 0.5% from 1.2%, for example, and <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">Goldmans<\/span> taking US 2012 to 2.1% from 3.0%, but to see MS drop its 2011 global to 3.9% from 4.2% at this stage of the game, all one can really say, as is often the case, is &ldquo;Thanks Scoop&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWhen the IMF finally lowers its global forecasts, the market will be a screaming buy.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIn the meantime, fear is back. Gold jumped US$35.90 to US$1825.90\/oz last night, despite the US dollar index rising 0.6% to 74.22. Silver was up 1%. The Aussie has fallen one and a half cents to US$1.0388. The <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">VIX<\/span> volatility index in the US jumped 35% to 42 (it traded at 48 last week).<\/p>\n<p>\n\tCommodities were routed. Base metals all fell 2-3% in London with the exception of tin, which fell 6%. Brent oil dropped US$3.61 to US$106.99\/<span class=\"scayt-misspell\">bbl<\/span>, while West Texas plunged US$5.85 to US$81.73\/<span class=\"scayt-misspell\">bbl<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">SPI<\/span> Overnight is down 103 points or 2.4%.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tSo is it a case of here we go again? Well, it was nearly two weeks ago now that I pointed out the realities of sharp stock market plunges. History shows that a sustained rally never begins from a sudden reversal after a sudden drop. There are always false-start rallies first, and usually they are followed by further sharp drops, often to even lower levels. Only when the market gets to the point of &ldquo;giving up&rdquo;, when the buyers just disappear and the market can do nothing other than drift down further, will we find the bottom.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tLast night on Wall Street was not actually a selling rout. The Dow opened down 500 points and stayed around that level all day until the very death, when it rallied back 80 points. Volumes were decent for a summer&#039;s day, but not much more than half what they were on the heady days last week. All that really happened was that the buyers disappeared, at least until the very end. One might call it an orderly adjustment for renewed fear. Others would call it an overreaction in stocks, pointing to more benign bond markets responses.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tEither way, while the dust had settled somewhat this week after last week, the nervousness had not dissipated. That nervousness remains entrenched for now, and the script is still playing out.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tEarnings season highlights in Australia today include reports from Billabong ((BBG)), Fortescue ((FMG)), QBE ((QBE)) and Santos ((STO)). ANZ Bank ((ANZ)) will complete the Big Four updating the market with its own trading update today.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tRudi will be appearing on the BRR network&#039;s Roundtable panel at 3pm (<span class=\"scayt-misspell\">brr.com.au<\/span>).<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>[Note: All paying members at <span class=\"scayt-misspell\">FNArena<\/span> are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Counterparty fear reared its ugly head with regard to European banks last night, triggering a global financials-led rout. Dow down 419.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[90,23,21,29,24,41,91,22,46,26],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58698"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58698"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58698\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}