##{"id":58722,"date":"2011-08-23T10:38:30","date_gmt":"2011-08-23T00:38:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2011\/08\/23\/fortescue-upside-linked-to-targets-iron-ore-prices\/"},"modified":"2011-08-23T10:38:30","modified_gmt":"2011-08-23T00:38:30","slug":"fortescue-upside-linked-to-targets-iron-ore-prices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2011\/08\/23\/fortescue-upside-linked-to-targets-iron-ore-prices\/","title":{"rendered":"Fortescue Upside Linked To Targets, Iron Ore Prices"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\t<strong>&#8211; <span>Fortescue<\/span> result meets consensus expectations<br \/>\n\t&#8211; Cost guidance increased, earnings forecasts trimmed<br \/>\n\t&#8211; Production guidance maintained, brokers factor in some slippage<br \/>\n\t&#8211; Buy ratings continue to dominate<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\tBy Chris Shaw<\/p>\n<p>\n\tFull year underlying earnings for iron ore play <span>Fortescue<\/span> Metals ((<span>FMG<\/span>)) came in at US$1,634 million, a significant increase from the US$707 million earned for the same period last year. The result was broadly in line with consensus estimates, UBS noting this was no surprise given some revenue and costs numbers had previously been advised to the market.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOne feature of the result for Goldman Sachs was an increase in costs, with <span>Fortescue<\/span> indicating operating costs are likely to remain around the US$50 per <span>tonne<\/span> level for the immediate future. Higher stripping ratios for <span>Fortescue<\/span> should mean ongoing higher structural unit costs than for the likes of <span>BHP<\/span> <span>Billiton<\/span> ((<span>BHP<\/span>)) and Rio Tinto ((RIO)), notes Goldman Sachs.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tFactoring in higher unit costs has seen cuts to earnings estimates for <span>Fortescue<\/span>, UBS lowering its numbers in coming years by 5-8%. UBS&#039;s valuation has also been lowered by 5% to $8.18. <span>Citi<\/span> similarly trimmed its <span>FY12<\/span> earnings estimate by 4% to account for the increase in cost guidance, noting costs are unlikely to come down much prior to the Solomon project coming on-line in 2013\/14.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tEven adjusting for higher costs, <span>Citi<\/span> sees solid upside risk to earnings from continued strength in iron ore prices, estimating potential upside of as much as 40% in <span>FY13<\/span> and 80% in <span>FY14<\/span> based on current spot prices.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<span>Fortescue<\/span> continues to guide to a production target of 155 million <span>tonnes<\/span> per annum in coming years, with management currently indicating this target should be achieved by 2013. The market is taking a more cautious view, JP Morgan factoring in a two-year delay relative to this target and <span>Citi<\/span> building in related <span>capex<\/span> assumptions of US$10 billion compared to management&#039;s forecast of US$8.4 billion.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tGaining a 5th berth at Port Headland remains a key to achieving production targets notes <span>Citi<\/span>, as its numbers suggest consistently achieving more than 140 million <span>tonnes<\/span> per year will be difficult with only four berths at the port.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n\tDeutsche notes <span>Fortescue<\/span> intends to deal with the problem by using wider shops and faster loading to still reach 155 million <span>tonnes<\/span> in shipments, but this is seen as optimistic given movement constraints in the <span>harbour<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAssuming production growth guidance is achieved, Morgan Stanley sees upside, pointing out its base case valuation of $7.50 attributes risk weightings of 90% and 60% respectively for the <span>Chichester<\/span> and Solomon projects. If 100% risk weightings were assumed, the stockbroker&#039;s valuation would increase by <span>50c<\/span> and $1.90 per share respectively.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tGiven <span>Fortescue&#039;s<\/span> leverage to iron ore prices and the fact expansion plans remain on track, Macquarie suggests valuation is undemanding at current levels. The rest of the market agrees, as the <span>FNArena<\/span> database shows <span>Fortescue<\/span> is rated Buy by seven of the eight brokers to cover the stock as well as by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. The latter is within an Attractive view on the Australian Metals and Mining sector.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe exception to the Buy ratings is Deutsche Bank, which viewed the higher mining and <span>capex<\/span> costs and the berth 5 negotiations as additional uncertainties for <span>Fortescue<\/span>. This implies some downside risk to both valuation and shipping rate expectations, while earnings in coming years have been cut to account for higher mining costs.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOn Deutsche&#039;s numbers, <span>Fortescue<\/span> is only likely to hit 146 million <span>tonnes<\/span> in shipments by <span>FY17<\/span>. Assuming this is not achieved and total shipments only reach 130 million <span>tonnes<\/span>, Deutsche&#039;s valuation would fall to around $5.00 per share from a current $5.86.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe consensus price target for <span>Fortescue<\/span> according to the <span>FNArena<\/span> database is $7.97, down from $8.14 prior to the profit result. Targets range from Deutsche at $5.85 to Macquarie at $9.10.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tShares in <span>Fortescue<\/span> have displayed an annual trading range of $4.33 to $7.34. The current share price implies upside of almost 38% relative to the consensus price target in <span>FNArena&#039;s<\/span> database.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em>Find out why <span>FNArena<\/span> subscribers like the service so much: &quot;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index4.cfm?type=dsp_newsitem&amp;n=29EB960D-9DFF-C00E-7F6B464E5D52E250\">Your Feedback (Thank You)<\/a>&quot; &#8211; Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While costs are likely to stay higher Fortescue has reiterated production growth targets. Stockbrokers are pleased.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[89,88],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58722"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}