\n\tBy Greg Peel<\/p>\n
\n\t“Conditions in global financial markets had continued to be very unsettled, with uncertainty increasing about both the prospects for resolution of the sovereign debt and banking problems in Europe and the outlook for global economic growth.”<\/span><\/p>\n \n\tSo said the RBA<\/span> at its October meeting, as noted by the minutes of that meeting released this morning. The problem is that the meeting was on October 4, and on Sunday October 9 Chancellor Merkel and President Sarkozy<\/span> stepped out of their own meeting to announce to the world that they had a cunning plan. They couldn't say what it was yet, but it was very cunning, and should do the trick. Subsequently we've since seen a 10% stock market bounce.<\/p>\n \n\tThe statement above opens the final section in the October RBA<\/span> minutes, which is always the one entitled “Consideration for Monetary Policy”. That is, it's the one that matters. Given the RBA<\/span> was oblivious as to what was about to happen, the rest of the considerations have to be taken somewhat with a grain of salt.<\/p>\n \n\tIt was the minutes of the September RBA<\/span> meeting which gave the first hint that Europe might force the central bank to act if needs be. The October statement accompanying the “on hold” decision went one step further. After months of highlighting the inflationary pressures building due to Australia's runaway resource sector, the RBA<\/span> finally began to concede the rest of the economy was doing rather poorly. Perhaps poorly enough to mean inflation would not rise so much after all. Throw in another Lehman-style event stemming from Europe, and the RBA<\/span> was again ready to pull out the big guns and start cutting.<\/p>\n \n\tIn the September minutes, Australia's broader economy was “softer than earlier expected”. In the October minutes it is noted that in some sectors, “cautious behaviour<\/span> by households and the earlier rise in the exchange rate were having a notice dampening effect”. In September, Australia's economic growth outlook was “somewhat weaker than had been expected earlier”. In October, growth is “unlikely to be as strong as earlier expected”.<\/p>\n \n\tWhen the RBA<\/span> made its rate decision and released its accompanying statement on October 4, economists suddenly became convinced on the strength of the rhetoric that a rate cut was coming on Cup Day. Not all were convinced – some were still holding out for December – while others such as Westpac said “I told you so”. [Didn't really. They are more respectful than that.] <\/p>\n \n\tThen all of a sudden out came the September unemployment numbers. <\/p>\n \n\tOn October 4, the RBA<\/span> noted that labour<\/span> market conditions were “now a little softer”. Indeed the unemployment rate had ticked up to 5.3% in August from 5.1% in July, and given conditions appeared to be weakening further economists pencilled<\/span> in 5.3% again or worse for September. Everyone thus got a shock when the September number was 5.2%.<\/p>\n \n\tIt was enough for all those suddenly expecting a November rate rise to now suddenly expect nothing before December, and given European developments in the meantime to expect probably nothing until 2012.<\/p>\n \n\tSo these minutes probably don't mean a lot, other than to suggest in an upside-down fashion that there likely won't be a rate rise on Cup Day.<\/p>\n \n\tAnd for the past week or so now I've pointed out that the details of Europe's new Grand Plan are not expected to be revealed until the G20<\/span> leaders meeting beginning on November 3. Cup Day this year is November 1, so it remains difficult to see the RBA<\/span> making any sweeping policy decisions when two days later anything could happen and probably will.<\/p>\n \n\tRead the full minutes here<\/a>.
\n\t <\/p>\n