{"id":59613,"date":"2012-03-07T11:13:17","date_gmt":"2012-03-07T00:13:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2012\/03\/07\/gold-stocks-approaching-critical-level\/"},"modified":"2012-03-07T11:13:17","modified_gmt":"2012-03-07T00:13:17","slug":"gold-stocks-approaching-critical-level","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2012\/03\/07\/gold-stocks-approaching-critical-level\/","title":{"rendered":"Gold Stocks Approaching Critical Level"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\t<img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/ckfinder\/userfiles\/images\/Gold Stocks_TheChartist_March2012.jpg\" style=\"width: 670px;height: 556px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong><span>LAYMANS<\/span>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\tSince the end of December just over a 20.0% rise has been seen up to the highs made a couple of weeks ago which is a decent effort whichever way you look at it. Not only that but the price action has been strong and clean which always suggests there is further upside still to come. The only slight concern is the severity of the decline over the past few days which isn&rsquo;t looking quite as choppy as we&rsquo;d like. In fact the typical target area has already being met which is far from ideal. Remember we need to see symmetry both in terms of price and time which means the current pull-back should have taken longer to complete.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThis keeps the way open for some choppy price action over the coming weeks where it&rsquo;s more than feasible that the recent highs at 7209 are retested but rejected at the first attempt. We&rsquo;d then expect to see a further decline taking price back toward current levels completing the corrective phase. The one thing we don&rsquo;t want to see is the lower portion of the target area exceeded. It wouldn&rsquo;t invalidate the bullish scenario entirely but it would put it under some serious stress. So it&rsquo;s quite important in regard to the longer term prospects that buyers appear pretty quickly or the door remains open for those late December lows to be revisited. Not what we want to see.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>TECHNICAL:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\tDespite the less than ideal <span>retracement<\/span> from the high of wave-i our longer term pattern remains firmly intact meaning we&rsquo;ll continue to run with it until it starts to roll over. The <span>retracement<\/span> up to this juncture hasn&rsquo;t taken anywhere near 38.2% of the time taken by the prior trend which means in theory the <span>retracement<\/span> shouldn&rsquo;t have terminated. This is despite the typical <span>retracement<\/span> zone already having being tagged. What I&rsquo;d like to see now is a low volume choppy bounce back up to the highs of wave-i though I&rsquo;m not convinced that it&rsquo;s going to be the way forward.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIf those higher levels fail to be attained before weakness again start to show then a deep zigzag could well prove to be the pattern of choice. Not something we like to see as whenever the typical <span>retracement<\/span> zone is exceeded the chances lesson that our wanted trajectory is going to be taken. It doesn&rsquo;t mean to say our count is invalidated but it&rsquo;s a heads up in regard to us looking at possible alternatives. To invalidate our <span>labelling<\/span> the low of wave-(4) would need to be penetrated giving us a little wiggle room over the coming weeks. If it is breached then the April 2011 high is more significant than first anticipated resulting in a deeper and longer corrective phase.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tNot our highest expectation though we have to remain aligned to what the <span>technicals<\/span> are telling us and the various lines in the sand that validate\/invalidate our analysis. Should the bearish scenario be the path of least resistance then the <span>retracement<\/span> could rotate all the way down to around the 5000 level though it would likely take many months to get down into that region.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>Trading Strategy<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\t6\/3:<\/p>\n<p>\n\tDespite the target area being met the patterns at this stage lack symmetry meaning we have to remain slightly cautious in regard to any upside potential. As mentioned above a low volume corrective structure higher would be a strong signal that further weakness could be around the corner. Not that we&rsquo;re expecting a deep <span>retracement<\/span> but some choppy, messy price action could well be the way forward over the coming weeks. As long as the 61.8% <span>retracement<\/span> level isn&rsquo;t exceeded by a reasonable margin the bullish case over the longer term remains intact. Indeed 6458 should be our main focus of attention over the coming days. A break beneath would ring the alarm bells and suggest the low of wave-(4) is going to come under some pressure and quite feasibly penetrated by a reasonable margin.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tRe-published with permission of the publisher. www.thechartist.com.au All copyright remains with the publisher. The above views expressed are not <span>FNArena&#039;s<\/span> (see our disclaimer).<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<strong>Risk Disclosure Statement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\tTHE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING SECURITIES AND LEVERAGED INSTRUMENTS I.E. DERIVATIVES, SUCH AS FUTURES, OPTIONS AND CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. YOU SHOULD THEREFORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER YOUR OBJECTIVES, FINANCIAL SITUATION, NEEDS AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU. THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN OBTAINABLE IN FUTURES, OPTIONS AND CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE TRADING CAN WORK AGAINST YOU AS WELL AS FOR YOU. THE USE OF LEVERAGE CAN LEAD TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS. THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL OF THE RISKS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVES MARKETS. THEREFORE, YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR ACCOUNTANT TO DETERMINE WHETHER TRADING IN SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVES PRODUCTS IS APPROPRIATE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<em><strong>Technical limitations If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we <span>apologise<\/span>, but technical limitations are to blame.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Chartist hasn&#8217;t given up his positive bias on gold stocks as yet, but he wouldn&#8217;t like to see much more weakness from here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[22],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59613"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59613\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}