##{"id":59808,"date":"2012-04-17T13:05:58","date_gmt":"2012-04-17T03:05:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2012\/04\/17\/yet-another-disappointment-from-paladin\/"},"modified":"2012-04-17T13:05:58","modified_gmt":"2012-04-17T03:05:58","slug":"yet-another-disappointment-from-paladin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2012\/04\/17\/yet-another-disappointment-from-paladin\/","title":{"rendered":"Yet Another Disappointment From Paladin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\t<strong>&nbsp;&#8211; Paladin&#039;s March quarter production disappoints (yet again)<br \/>\n\t&nbsp;&#8211; Sales solid, expected to be stronger in June quarter<br \/>\n\t&nbsp;&#8211; Minor changes to broker models post the report<br \/>\n\t&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;Brokers remain split on outlook for Paladin<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\tBy Chris Shaw<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe three months to the end of March proved to be yet another disappointing production period for Paladin ((<span>PDN<\/span>)), with both the <span>Langer<\/span> Heinrich and <span>Kayelekera<\/span> mines operating below market expectations for the quarter.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tTotal uranium production in the quarter was 1.77 million pounds, JP Morgan noting this fell 3% short of the December quarter and was lower than the broker&#039;s forecast of 1.98 million pounds. <span>Langer<\/span> Heinrich fell short due to commissioning bottlenecks and lower grade feed, while unsuccessful testing of a new reagent impacted on performance at <span>Kayelekera<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe production result meant guidance for the full year has been trimmed, management now forecasting full year output of 6.95 million pounds. Brokers have adjusted to this by trimming expectations, <span>Citi<\/span> cutting its production forecast for <span>FY12<\/span> to 6.9 million pounds from 7.0 million pounds previously.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOn the plus side, <span>Citi<\/span> notes sales for Paladin during the period were achieved at a slightly higher price than expected, the average <span>realised<\/span> sales price of US$59.17 per pound coming in above the broker&#039;s US$57.70 forecast.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tInventory levels also increased during the March quarter, something <span>Citi<\/span> expects will result in higher sales in the June quarter. BA Merrill Lynch agrees, pointing out Paladin&#039;s sales volumes tend to be unevenly distributed throughout the year. This means a significantly higher sales figure for the June quarter should come as no great surprise.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe other changes to models are longer-dated, an example being UBS&#039;s expectations for <span>Langer<\/span> Heinrich Stage 4. The broker now sees first production from this stage being delayed by nine months relative to previous estimates, to the first half of 2015. This has a minor impact on both earnings in coming years and valuation for Paladin, UBS trimming its valuation by 1% to $2.60.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWhile there have been minor changes to models across the market, price targets and ratings have not been adjusted. The <span>FNArena<\/span> database shows Paladin is rated as Buy three times, Hold three times and Sell once. The consensus price target is $2.18, with targets ranging from Macquarie at $1.50 to JP Morgan at $3.35.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWith respect to the Buy argument for Paladin, JP Morgan continues to be attracted to the group&#039;s leverage to spot uranium prices. As the broker notes, the average estimated incentive price for new uranium production is around US$80 per pound. Given this is above current spot prices there is potential for projects to be delayed or <span>cancelled<\/span>, potentially leading to a tightening market and higher prices in JP Morgan&#039;s view.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAnother positive noted by <span>Citi<\/span> is the potential for Paladin to create value by selling some assets. At present Paladin is in discussion with potential joint venture partners with respect to undeveloped assets, but <span>Citi<\/span> suggests this is unlikely to raise enough funds to meet some debt repayments due next year.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThis leads <span>Citi<\/span> to suggest selling a joint venture stake in an undeveloped asset would both reduce development risk and generate a value for something the market currently ascribes little value to. This offers some upside potential in the broker&#039;s view.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIn contrast, Deutsche continues to rate Paladin as a Hold, reflecting both the expectation of further minor delays to production as expansions are bedded down and with upcoming <span>capex<\/span> and refinancing requirements continuing to pressure the group&#039;s balance sheet. UBS sides with Deutsche in that funding and cash flow remain concerns, though the broker suggests these could be removed if asset sales result from Paladin&#039;s strategic review process.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tIn a relatively flat market shares in Paladin are weaker today and as at 12.40pm the stock was down 8.5c at $1.69. This compares to a range over the past year of $1.11 to $3.80 and implies upside of just under 30% relative to the consensus price target in the <span>FNArena<\/span> database.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t&nbsp;<br \/>\n\t<em>Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: &quot;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index4.cfm?type=dsp_newsitem&amp;n=29EB960D-9DFF-C00E-7F6B464E5D52E250\">Your Feedback (Thank You)<\/a>&quot; &#8211; Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Paladin delivered yet another disappointing March quarter production report. Expectations remain that sales will improve in coming quarters, but broker opinion on the stock remains divided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[25],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59808"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}