##{"id":60512,"date":"2012-09-03T11:40:07","date_gmt":"2012-09-03T01:40:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2012\/09\/03\/positive-signs-for-paladin\/"},"modified":"2012-09-03T11:40:07","modified_gmt":"2012-09-03T01:40:07","slug":"positive-signs-for-paladin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/2012\/09\/03\/positive-signs-for-paladin\/","title":{"rendered":"Positive Signs For Paladin?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\t<strong>&nbsp;&#8211; Paladin result impacted by impairments, costs and uranium price<br \/>\n\t&nbsp;&#8211; Debt expected to fall, balance sheet pressures have eased<br \/>\n\t&nbsp;&#8211; Production outlook improving, some positives for uranium prices<br \/>\n\t&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\tBy Chris Shaw<\/p>\n<p>\n\tFor the full year to June 30 uranium producer Paladin Energy ((<span class=\"scayt-misspell\">PDN<\/span>)) reported a worse than expected headline loss of US$173 million, the result being impacted by a number of impairments relating to inventories and the Kayelekera project. Underlying earnings were also impacted by higher costs and weak uranium prices during the period.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAs well, JP Morgan notes Paladin&#039;s breakeven cash flow result for the year was due in part to the timing of one shipment falling into FY13. Adjusting for the shipment leaves JP Morgan expecting a return to positive cash flows in the September quarter.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe result was accompanied by production guidance for FY13 of 8.0-8.5 million pounds, with costs at Langer Heinrich expected to be less than US$30 per pound and in the low US$40&#039;s per pound at Kayelekera.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tCiti notes a proposed stage 4 expansion at Langer Heinrich remains on hold given high a capex requirement of more than US$400 million. A 3.5 stage expansion generating around 75% of proposed capacity but at significantly lower capex could work in Citi&#039;s view, though further expansions remain dependent on improved uranium prices over a sustained period.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOne positive to come out of the result for BA Merrill Lynch is a likely fall in Paladin&#039;s debt levels, as management is targeting a gearing ratio of less than 30% in coming years from 42% now. BA-ML estimates this would see debt fall from US$925 million now to around US$738 million in FY13.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tCosts are also expected to improve and as part of a program to optimise costs Paladin is considering replacing high cost diesel fuel with electricity. BA-ML suggests this could reduce power costs by as much as 70% and could be rolled out over the next 18 months.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOn the negative side, UBS sees cash balances at Paladin as coming under pressure in the coming year. Estimates of payments to suppliers suggests a minimum required uranium price of US$50 per pound, based on sales of eight million pounds for the year. UBS notes year to date uranium prices have averaged US$51.09 per pound but are currently below the US$50 per pound level.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tBalance sheet pressures have been eased by the company recently agreeing to a long-term offtake agreement that included a US$200 million pre-payment. UBS notes the funds will allow Paladin to repay some convertible bonds due in March of 2013.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n\tWith balance sheet issues now put to rest, Deutsche Bank suggests the market will focus on production at Paladin&#039;s operations and the outlook for uranium prices. There are already signs of improvement with respect to production, while BA-ML sees some positives for uranium prices as well.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tManagement at Paladin has indicated uranium supply is coming under pressure given a number of project cuts and delays. In BA-ML&#039;s view this has potential to create something of a supply iceberg, so pushing the market into a significant deficit.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tJP Morgan also expects uranium prices to improve going forward, which underpins the broker&#039;s positive view on Paladin. While trimming its price target to $2.40 from $2.55, JP Morgan continues to rate Paladin as Overweight.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe rest of the market is split on the outlook for Paladin, the FNArena database showing three Buy recommendations and four Hold ratings. The Buys are courtesy of Citi, BA-ML and JP Morgan and all factor in the full year result, while not all FNArena database brokers have updated as yet. The consensus price target for Paladin now stands at $1.88, down slightly from $1.91 prior to the result. Targets range from Macquarie at $1.30 to BA-ML at $2.70, this spread being partly explained by different assumptions with respect to the uranium price outlook.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tShares in Paladin today are down slightly in a weaker overall market and as at 11.10am the stock was 4c lower at $1.275. The current share price implies upside of better than 40% relative to the consensus price target in the FNArena database and compares to a range over the past year of $1.05 to $2.01.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t&nbsp;<br \/>\n\t<em>Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: &quot;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fnarena.com\/index4.cfm?type=dsp_newsitem&amp;n=29EB960D-9DFF-C00E-7F6B464E5D52E250\">Your Feedback (Thank You)<\/a>&quot; &#8211; Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While Paladin Energy&#8217;s headline loss was larger than expected brokers have seen some positive signs in the result.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[25],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60512"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60512\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.fnarena.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}